RESUMO

BACKGROUND: During the last decade, the progressive increase in age and associated chronic comorbidities and polypharmacy. However, assessments of the risk of emergency department (ED) revisiting published to date often neglect patients' pharmacotherapy plans, thus overseeing the Drug-related problems (DRP) risks associated with the therapy burden. The aim of this study is to develop a predictive model for ED revisit, hospital admission, and mortality based on patient's characteristics and pharmacotherapy. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including adult patients visited in the ED (triage 1, 2, or 3) of multiple hospitals in Catalonia (Spain) during 2019. The primary endpoint was a composite of ED visits, hospital admission, or mortality 30 days after ED discharge. The study population was randomly split into a model development (60%) and validation (40%) datasets. The model included age, sex, income level, comorbidity burden, measured with the Adjusted Morbidity Groups (GMA), and number of medications. Forty-four medication groups, associated with medication-related health problems, were assessed using ATC codes. To assess the performance of the different variables, logistic regression was used to build multivariate models for ED revisits. The models were created using a "stepwise-forward" approach based on the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). Area under the curve of the receiving operating characteristics (AUCROC) curve for the primary endpoint was calculated. RESULTS: 851.649 patients were included; 134.560 (15.8%) revisited the ED within 30 days from discharge, 15.2% were hospitalized and 9.1% died within 30 days from discharge. Four factors (sex, age, GMA, and income level) and 30 ATC groups were identified as risk factors and combined into a final score. The model showed an AUCROC values of 0.720 (95%CI:0.718-0.721) in the development cohort and 0.719 (95%CI.0.717-0.721) in the validation cohort. Three risk categories were generated, with the following scores and estimated risks: low risk: 18.3%; intermediate risk: 40.0%; and high risk: 62.6%. CONCLUSION: The DICER score allows identifying patients at high risk for ED revisit within 30 days based on sociodemographic, clinical, and pharmacotherapeutic characteristics, being a valuable tool to prioritize interventions on discharge.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To draft a list of actions and quality indicators for pharmacist care in hospital emergency departments, based on consensus among a panel of experts regarding which actions to prioritize in this setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A panel of experts from the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH) and the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES) evaluated a preliminary list of potential actions and quality of care indicators. The experts used a questionnaire to assess the proposals on the basis of available evidence. In the first round, each expert individually assessed the importance of each proposed action based on 4 dimensions: evidence base, impact on clinical response and patient safety, ease of implementation, and priority. In the second round the experts attended a virtual meeting to reach consensus on a revised list of proposals; suggestions and comments that had been made anonymously in the first round were included. The group then prioritized each action as basic, intermediate, or advanced. RESULTS: The experts evaluated a total of 26 potential actions and associated quality indicators. No items were eliminated in the analysis of scores and comments from the first round. After the second round, 25 actions survived. Nine were considered basic, 10 intermediate, and 6 advanced. CONCLUSION: The expert panel's list of pharmacist actions and care quality indicators provides a basis for developing a pharmacist care program in Spanish emergency departments on 3 levels of priority. The list can serve as a guide to pharmacists, managers, physicians, and nurses involved in the effort to improve drug therapy in this hospital setting.

OBJETIVO: Desarrollar un conjunto de actividades e indicadores de atención farmacéutica en los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios mediante un consenso colectivo de un panel de expertos que permita priorizar las actividades a realizar por los farmacéuticos en estas unidades. METODO: Un comité formado por miembros de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria (SEFH) y de la Sociedad Española de Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias (SEMES) evaluó una propuesta inicial de actividades e indicadores potenciales, basados en la evidencia científica disponible, en formato de cuestionario. En una primera ronda, cada uno de los expertos del panel clasificó de forma individual la relevancia de cada una de las actividades propuestas en cuatro dimensiones: evidencia científica, impacto en la respuesta clínica y seguridad para el paciente, facilidad de implementación y grado de prioridad. La segunda ronda se realizó mediante una reunión grupal de forma virtual, a partir del cuestionario modificado de acuerdo con las sugerencias planteadas, así como los comentarios vertidos por los participantes del panel de forma anónima. En esta ronda, cada actividad fue clasificada por consenso como básica, intermedia o avanzada en función del grado de prioridad de implantación considerado por el grupo de expertos. RESULTADOS: Se propusieron un total de 26 potenciales actividades a los expertos, con indicadores asociados. Tras el análisis de las puntuaciones y los comentarios realizados en la primera ronda, no se eliminó ninguna de las actividades propuestas. Tras la segunda ronda, se mantuvieron 25 actividades, de las cuales se puntuaron 9 como actividades básicas, 10 actividades como intermedias y 6 actividades como avanzadas. CONCLUSIONES: El desarrollo del conjunto de actividades e indicadores de atención farmacéutica en urgencias, priorizados por grado de relevancia para la unidad, es la base para el desarrollo de esta cartera de servicios en los hospitales españoles, y sirve como guía tanto para farmacéuticos como para gestores, médicos y enfermeros de la unidad a fin de mejorar la farmacoterapia los pacientes atendidos en los servicios de urgencias.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Deprescribing is considered one of the main strategies available for  preparing an individualized therapeutic plan in patients with multiple pathologies or complex chronic conditions. However, despite the practice has been in place for some years, there is a need for studies that support the achievement of satisfactory health outcomes, as well as tools that help implement deprescribing in routine clinical practice. The  bjective of this project is to analyze the impact of reducing polypharmacy,  through the LESS-CHRON deprescribing tool, on a population  of elderly polymedicated patients with multiple conditions. METHOD: This will be a quasi-experimental, pre-and-post intervention multicenter cohort study. The variables to be analyzed will be  divided into two large groups: those related to pharmacology and those related to health outcomes. They will be collected at baseline, at 3 and at 6-12  months. A first screening phase will be carried out to recruit candidate patients  and obtain information about the identified deprescribing  opportunities. The second phase will constitute the intervention phase, where  the LESS-CHRON tool will be applied and the actual deprescribing of the drugs  will be carried out. DISCUSSION: LESS-CHRON has been proclaimed as a suitable deprescribing tool in clinical practice. Validation of LESS-CHRON will seek to show the results that can be achieved following the deprescribing of drugs,  in addition to demonstrating that the tool can reliably be used by clinicians in  their routine practice. On the other hand, the results of this project may  provide information leading to improving or adapting the tool itself, giving rise  to a second generation of more efficient version.

OBJETIVO: La desprescripción se considera una de las principales estrategias disponibles para el abordaje del plan terapéutico individualizado en  pacientes pluripatológicos o crónicos complejos. Sin embargo, a pesar de ser una práctica ya instaurada desde hace algunos años, se reclama la necesidad de estudios que avalen la obtención de buenos resultados en salud, además de herramientas que ayuden a su desarrollo en la práctica clínica habitual. El objetivo de este proyecto es analizar el impacto en  la disminución de la farmacoterapia mediante la desprescripción de fármacos, aplicando la herramienta LESS-CHRON, en una población de  pacientes de edad avanzada, polimedicada y con múltiples patologías.Método: Estudio cuasiexperimental, pre-post, multicéntrico. Las variables a analizar se dividirán en dos grandes grupos: referidas a la esfera  farmacológica y referidas a resultados en salud. Se recogerán en el momento  basal, a los 3 y a los 6-12 meses. Se realizará una primera fase de screening  para localizar a los pacientes candidatos, que permitirá obtener la información relativa a las oportunidades de desprescripción identificadas. La  segunda constituirá la fase de intervención, en la que se aplicará la  herramienta LESS-CHRON y se llevará a cabo la desprescripción real de los  fármacos.Discusión: LESS­CHRON se ha proclamado como una herramienta adecuada para llevar a cabo la desprescripción de fármacos en la práctica clínica. La validación de la herramienta LESS-CHRON tratará de poner  de manifiesto los resultados que se logran tras efectuar la desprescripción,  además de demostrar su fiabilidad como herramienta, de modo que los clínicos puedan usarla como parte de su actividad asistencial con total  confianza. Por otro lado, los resultados de este proyecto podrán arrojar  información para la mejora o adaptación de la propia herramienta, dando lugar  a una segunda generación o futuras versiones mejoradas y más  eficientes.

Assuntos

RESUMO

Objetivo: La desprescripción se considera una de las principales estrategias disponibles para el abordaje del plan terapéutico individualizado enpacientes pluripatológicos o crónicos complejos. Sin embargo, a pesar deser una práctica ya instaurada desde hace algunos años, se reclama lanecesidad de estudios que avalen la obtención de buenos resultados ensalud, además de herramientas que ayuden a su desarrollo en la prácticaclínica habitual. El objetivo de este proyecto es analizar el impacto en ladisminución de la farmacoterapia mediante la desprescripción de fármacos,aplicando la herramienta LESS-CHRON, en una población de pacientes deedad avanzada, polimedicada y con múltiples patologías.Método: Estudio cuasiexperimental, pre-post, multicéntrico. Las variables aanalizar se dividirán en dos grandes grupos: referidas a la esfera farmacológica y referidas a resultados en salud. Se recogerán en el momento basal,a los 3 y a los 6-12 meses. Se realizará una primera fase de screening paralocalizar a los pacientes candidatos, que permitirá obtener la informaciónrelativa a las oportunidades de desprescripción identificadas. La segundaconstituirá la fase de intervención, en la que se aplicará la herramientaLESS-CHRON y se llevará a cabo la desprescripción real de los fármacos.(AU)

Objective: Deprescribing is considered one of the main strategies available for preparing an individualized therapeutic plan in patients withmultiple pathologies or complex chronic conditions. However, despite thepractice has been in place for some years, there is a need for studies thatsupport the achievement of satisfactory health outcomes, as well as toolsthat help implement deprescribing in routine clinical practice. The objective of this project is to analyze the impact of reducing polypharmacy,through the LESS-CHRON deprescribing tool, on a population of elderlypolymedicated patients with multiple conditions.Method: This will be a quasi-experimental, pre-and-post interventionmulticenter cohort study. The variables to be analyzed will be dividedinto two large groups: those related to pharmacology and those related to health outcomes. They will be collected at baseline, at 3 and at6-12 months. A first screening phase will be carried out to recruit candidate patients and obtain information about the identified deprescribingopportunities. The second phase will constitute the intervention phase,where the LESS-CHRON tool will be applied and the actual deprescribingof the drugs will be carried out. (AU)

Assuntos

RESUMO

Background: Drug-related problems (DRPs) are a frequent reason for emergency departments (EDs) visits. However, data about the risk factors associated with EDs revisits are limited. Objective: To develop and validate a predictive model indicating the risk factors associated with EDs revisit within 30 days of the first visit. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving patients who attended an ED for DRPs related to cardiovascular drugs. A 30-day prediction model was created in a derivation cohort by logistic regression. An integer score proportional to the regression coefficient was assigned to the variables with P < .100 in the multivariate analysis. Results: 581 patients (mean age: 80.0 [12.6] years) were included, 133 (22.9%) revisited the ED within 30 days from discharge. Six factors (chronic kidney disease, chronic heart failure, visit to an ED in the preceding 3 months, high anticholinergic burden, DRPs associated with heparin, and safety-related DRPs) were identified as risk factors and combined into a final score, termed the DREAMER score. The model reached an area under the receiver operating curve values of 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.67-0.77) in the referral cohort and 0.71 (95% CI = 0.65-0.74) in the validation cohort (P = .273). Three risk categories were generated, with the following scores and estimated risks: low risk (0-8 points): 11.6%; intermediate risk (9-14 points): 21.3%; and high risk (>14 points): 41.2%. Conclusion and Relevance: The DREAMER score identifies patients at high risk for ED revisit within 30 days from the first visit for a DRPs, being a useful tool to prioritize interventions on discharge.

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the anticholinergic burden on discharge of patients treated for constipation in an emergency department (ED) and to assess the effect on emergency revisiting within 30 days. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational retrospective cohort study. We collected cases with a discharge diagnosis of constipation after ED treatment between September 2018 and June 2019 and recorded information on all drugs taken and the anticholinergic burden of treatment. A revisit to the ED within 30 days was the primary outcome. RESULTS: We included 104 patients. A high anticholinergic burden of treatment was identified in 47 (56.6%), an intermediate burden in 30 (36.1%), and a low burden in 6 (7.2%). Twenty-nine (27.9%) patients revisited the ED within 30 days of discharge. An intermediate anticholinergic burden (23 patients [31.1%] vs 4 [13.3%]; P = .061) and high burden (19 [40.4%] vs 8 [14.1%]; P = .002] was associated with revisiting within 30 days in the univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, a high anticholinergic burden was independently associated with a higher rate of revisiting than a low burden: adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 4.21; 95% CI, 1.07-16.5; P = .039. An intermediate load was not associated with more revisits, however: aOR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.25-6.41; P = .776. Prescription of long-term treatment with laxatives on discharge did not reduce revisiting withing 30-days in the group with a high anticholinergic load (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.48-3.27; P = .526), but it did have an effect in patients an intermediate burden (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02-0.99; P = .049). CONCLUSION: The prescription of drugs leading to a high anticholinergic burden was a factor associated with ED revisits within 30 days in patients treated for constipation.

OBJETIVO: Evaluar la frecuencia e impacto de la carga anticolinérgica del tratamiento en la reconsulta a los 30 días en los pacientes atendidos por estreñimiento en un servicio de urgencias (SU). METODO: Estudio observacional de cohortes retrospectivo. Se incluyeron por oportunidad pacientes que fueron dados de alta con diagnóstico de estreñimiento desde un SU entre septiembre 2018 y junio 2019. Se recogieron los fármacos y su carga anticolinérgica. La variable de resultado fue la reconsulta por cualquier causa a los 30 días. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 104 pacientes, 47 (56,6%) se clasificaron como tratamiento con alta carga colinérgica, 30 (36,1%) intermedia y 6 (7,2%) baja. Veintinueve (27,9%) pacientes sufrieron una reconsulta a urgencias en los primeros 30 días tras el alta. Los pacientes con fármacos con una carga anticolinérgica alta tuvieron una mayor frecuencia de reconsultas a 30 días [19/47 (40,4%) vs 8/57 (14,1%); p = 0,002]. Tras el análisis multivarible, en comparación con aquellos con tratamiento con baja carga anticolinérgica, el tener una alta carga (ORa = 4,21; IC 95% 1,07-16,5; p = 0,039), pero no intermedia (ORa = 1,27; IC 95% 0,25-6,41; p = 0,776), se asoció de forma independiente con una mayor reconsulta a los 30 días. La prescripción de laxantes crónicos al alta no redujo la reconsulta a 30 días en el grupo con alta carga anticolinérgica (OR = 0,86; IC 95% 0,48-3,27; p = 0,526), pero sí en aquellos con carga intermedia (OR = 0,13; IC 95% 0,02-0,99; p = 0,049). CONCLUSIONES: La prescripción de fármacos con alta carga anticolinérgica fue un factor asociado con reconsulta a los 30 días en los pacientes atendidos por estreñimiento en urgencias.

Assuntos

RESUMO

OBJETIVO: Evaluar la frecuencia e impacto de la carga anticolinérgica del tratamiento en la reconsulta a los 30 días en los pacientes atendidos por estreñimiento en un servicio de urgencias (SU). MÉTODO: Estudio observacional de cohortes retrospectivo. Se incluyeron por oportunidad pacientes que fueron dados de alta con diagnóstico de estreñimiento desde un SU entre septiembre 2018 y junio 2019. Se recogieron los fármacos y su carga anticolinérgica. La variable de resultado fue la reconsulta por cualquier causa a los 30 días. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 104 pacientes, 47 (56,6%) se clasificaron como tratamiento con alta carga colinérgica, 30 (36,1%) intermedia y 6 (7,2%) baja. Veintinueve (27,9%) pacientes sufrieron una reconsulta a urgencias en los primeros 30 días tras el alta. Los pacientes con fármacos con una carga anticolinérgica alta tuvieron una mayor frecuencia de reconsultas a 30 días [19/47 (40,4%) vs 8/57 (14,1%); p = 0,002]. Tras el análisis multivarible, en comparación con aquellos con tratamiento con baja carga anticolinérgica, el tener una alta carga (ORa = 4,21; IC 95% 1,07-16,5; p = 0,039), pero no intermedia (ORa = 1,27; IC 95% 0,25-6,41; p = 0,776), se asoció de forma independiente con una mayor reconsulta a los 30 días. La prescripción de laxantes crónicos al alta no redujo la reconsulta a 30 días en el grupo con alta carga anticolinérgica (OR = 0,86; IC 95% 0,48-3,27; p = 0,526), pero sí en aquellos con carga intermedia (OR = 0,13; IC 95% 0,02-0,99; p = 0,049). CONCLUSIONES: La prescripción de fármacos con alta carga anticolinérgica fue un factor asociado con reconsulta a los 30 días en los pacientes atendidos por estreñimiento en urgencias

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the anticholinergic burden on discharge of patients treated for constipation in an emergency department (ED) and to assess the effect on emergency revisiting within 30 days. METHODS: Observational retrospective cohort study. We collected cases with a discharge diagnosis of constipation after ED treatment between September 2018 and June 2019 and recorded information on all drugs taken and the anticholinergic burden of treatment. A revisit to the ED within 30 days was the primary outcome. RESULTS: We included 104 patients. A high anticholinergic burden of treatment was identified in 47 (56.6%), an intermediate burden in 30 (36.1%), and a low burden in 6 (7.2%). Twenty-nine (27.9%) patients revisited the ED within 30 days of discharge. An intermediate anticholinergic burden (23 patients [31.1%] vs 4 [13.3%]; P = .061) and high burden (19 [40.4%] vs 8 [14.1%]; P = .002] was associated with revisiting within 30 days in the univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, a high anticholinergic burden was independently associated with a higher rate of revisiting than a low burden: adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 4.21; 95% CI, 1.07-16.5; P = .039. An intermediate load was not associated with more revisits, however: aOR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.25-6.41; P = .776. Prescription of long-term treatment with laxatives on discharge did not reduce revisiting withing 30-days in the group with a high anticholinergic load (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.48-3.27; P = .526), but it did have an effect in patients an intermediate burden (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.02-0.99; P = .049). CONCLUSION: The prescription of drugs leading to a high anticholinergic burden was a factor associated with ED revisits within 30 days in patients treated for constipation

Assuntos

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Medication errors lead to morbidity and mortality among emergency department (ED) patients. An inaccurate medication history is one of the underlying causes of these errors. OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to determine the prevalence of patients with discrepancies between the medical list information contained in the clinical history compiled on admission to the ED and the list of medications patients are actually taking, to characterize the discrepancies found, and to analyze whether certain factors are associated with the risk of discrepancies. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, descriptive, observational, multicenter study with an analytic component in the EDs of 11 hospitals in Spain. We compared pharmacist-obtained medication lists (PML) with ED-obtained medication lists (EDML). Discrepancy was defined as one or more differences (in drug or dosage or route of administration) between the EDML and PML. The endpoints were the proportion of patients with discrepancies in their home medical lists, and the prevalence of certain factors among patients with discrepancies and those without. RESULTS: We detected 1476 discrepancies in 387 patients; no discrepancies were found in 20.7%. The most frequent discrepancies involved incomplete information (44.2%) and omission (41.8%). In the bivariate analysis, age, number of medications, and Charlson comorbidity score were significantly associated with discrepancy. In the multivariate analysis, number of medications and hospital were the variables associated with discrepancy. CONCLUSIONS: The EDML differed from the list of medications patients were actually taking in 79.3% of cases. Incomplete information and omission were the most frequent discrepancies. Age, number of medications, and comorbidities were related to the risk of discrepancies.

Assuntos